Archive for April, 2007

The Perfect Mess – Part 1

Taxes suck. Besides being horribly complicated, they highlight my inclination toward disorder rather than order. While I covet organizational systems, I don’t find that I use many of them or use them for long. This isn’t to say that I don’t generally know where to go find stuff, but I’m definitely more of a piler than a filer and not proud of it.

All of this got me to thinking though of the cost of organization, not only in time and energy, but also psychologically feeling behind. Clearly, the cost of disorganization is easy to recognize — people who feel neglected because they happened to fall off the top of the inbox pile, to-do committments that get missed because they slipped through the cracks, not being able to find a critical receipt for tax purposes. This is the reason I covet organizational systems, but I also find that if I become a slave to those systems I spent more time on the system then the benefits I obtain by having it.

This got me to thinking about organizational systems in general and how to measure the benefits AND costs of the system in order to optimize the throughput/effectiveness of myself. The costs normally come in the the form of time spent organizing as well as a piling list of to-do items that are never really going to get done. The cost of not having the system becomes the best way to measure the benefit – besides the psychological thrill of owning your world rather than it owning you. What is the cost of having something fall through the cracks? What is the relational cost of not getting back to people who email you? etc.

So my desire is to be organized, to rule the world I live in and not be a slave to it, yet also not to waste my time on busy work that gets me only negligable return. I want the system to be as simple as possible, but not simpler, as they say.

It was in this mindset that I came across the book, “The Perfect Mess: The Hidden Benefits of Disorder”. I normally don’t buy books at full price, but this was was too timely to my current thinking and so I bought it and plan to read it shortly. Before doing so, I wanted to capture some of my own thoughts and see how they compare, hence, this post.

One final thought I have on this is that I think some of the things we perceive as messy, are actually order that transcends our comprehension.  This is basically the idea behind Chaos Math (not that there is no order, but rather that the order lies outside of our ability to quickly comprehend it.  Anyway, I may delve more into some of the ideas I have on cost structures etc after I read the book.  I also found a few other books that I’ll need to read, and since I now have two friends who are GTD (Getting Things Done) fans, I’m sure I’ll have to read that book too.

Cooked

When I read an excerpt of Cooked on the Freakonomics Blog, I thought, I have to read this book. When I saw it at the library, I decided to check it out.

Jeff Henderson writes with a lot of color which made the book really enjoyable to read. Unfortunately, it has not necessarily had a positive effect on my vernacular as I find I’m wanting to add a bit more street slang into my normal conversation.

The book is a pretty good story of a guy who started out in a rough spot, learned to master being a hustler, made it big, went to prison, and then reformed his life by becoming a Chef. He clearly is quite smart and also very determined; he is a natural born leader, but it’s interesting to see how he gets there by finding the guy that knows his stuff and learning as much as he could from them.  It’s a worthwhile read and pretty fascinating – both about kitchens and about life on the streets.

So, I’m trying to decide if my re-found interest in gourmet cooking was inspired by this book or if it has just been lying latent until recently, but I do think it would be fun to be a Chef. I’ll have to add it to the list of other careers I think would be fascinating, if only there was more time.

Sorry to all that have to put up with my slang for the next few days until it works its way through my system.

Voce

One of the blogs I like to read is from Seth Godin and he recently had a post on Voce, which is a new cell phone service company.  Seth made the point that he thought that even though Voce claimed to be better, there was little trust in the consumer to believe such a claim.  He makes some good points, but misses another one.

Voce have another marketing problem in addition to garnering trust (which is essentially the “Crossing the Chasm” problem).  It struck me that most people don’t actually need all of the services they are paying for.  For instance, how often do you call your cell phone for technical assistance on your phone?

Everyone currently entrenched with their current provider using their current cell phone (that they are likely attached to), will be comparing their current costs with the $200/month fee.  Since most will see this as a higher fee than they are currently paying (and also comparitively larger than other utilities), they will compare services and start saying, “well, I really don’t need that nor that” etc.

So on top of a trust issue, they don’t seem to be capitalizing on what’s not good enough in the cell phone industry.  What’s not good enough is the service, but the service they have is simply the aggregate of everyone elses service which is already known to be poor.  Beyond trust, they haven’t really added anything to the mix to even start focusing on the item people find most valuable.  If they are able to beat the aggregate, and make a compelling argument for why their service is better, I think that narrowing their enhancements to this one item is what would make all the difference.

More on Presentations

I’ve started reading a blog done by Seth Godin and have enjoyed some of his thoughts on various things. I thought his summary of a good presentation found by clicking here, presents some additional interesting ideas that are worth considering. I don’t agree with everything he says about a presentation, but the principles he is trying to put forward are pretty good.

I found this post from his link to the worst slide ever found by clicking here which I am now thinking to add to every one of my presentations.  Ultimately though, I thought the book Presenting To Win was a much more thorough exploration of good presentation technique and covers a lot of what Seth is refering to; multiple perspectives are great.

Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion

One of my areas of interest lately has been the emotional side of sales. Essentially, how does one evoke an emotional reaction to what is being provided. Clearly, it is necessary that the service/product being sold meets a fundamental need of the person buying, but the way a solution is presented makes a difference on the satisfaction and choice of the consumer.

This book was recommended as a good one to read on this topic, and indeed it is. This book is very much in a similar vain as Blink by Malcom Gladwell. This one goes into more depth about how people are persuaded to act. There are 6 primary reasons that are discussed:

  1. Reciprocity When someone does something for us, even without us asking, we end up feeling oblidged to act in their favor. Classic examples of this include Hare Krishna followers giving a flower as a free gift, but following with asking for a donation. Another example of course is the homeless person that washes your window and you feel compelled to give something even though you never asked. Related to this idea, is one where someone comes with a suggestion or request which is big and then subsequently asks for something much less. For example, the author had someone come to their door and ask if they wanted to buy tickets at $10 for a baseball game (for fundraising) and when the author said no, he asked if he wanted to buy some chocolate for $1/bar. He closed the door with two chocolate bars even though he doesn’t like chocolate. Since someone feels bad about saying no, coming back with another option that is much less will often result in a positive response. There were other examples of this principle that are quite fascinating.
  2. Committment and ConsistancyIn this case, a small committment can result in people changing who they are. One example of this was that people were called as part of a survey to see how many people are willing to volunteer. They were asked, “If you were asked to volunteer for 2 hours per week for a 2 year committment would you say yes?” People, wanting to be perceived as charitable, were very likely to say they were. Three weeks later, someone would actually call to see if they would volunteer and those who took the survey were about 3 times as likely to say they would and they were actually more committed to the opportunity than those who said yes but were not asked the survey question. Another example involved American POW’s in WWII that were in Chinese prison camps. The Chinese would obtain very small things, like an admission that America is not perfect and they would then use that small concession, to subsequently ask them to say how it wasn’t perfect, then to write them down, etc. By getting them to make a small concession without threat, they slowly got the prisoners to actually change the way they viewed China and America. Almost all of them had changed their view of communism upon coming home. Another way was getting people to write views that they don’t necessarily believe in for some small reward as they are more likely to acutally internalize those views. It seems like the University setting is another area where this could become used.
  3. Social Proof The idea behind this one is that in times of uncertainty people look to those around them to determine what they should do. The classic example of this is the murder that took place in New York City where an attacker murdered a woman with three different attacks. There were 37 people that saw the attack and only one called the police after she was dead. Each looked to their neighbor to assess whether or not there was a real problem, and assumed if there was, someone else would do something about it. Other forms of this are making things appear to be popular, salting a tip jar to make it looks like that’s what others do, etc.
  4. Liking The primary principle of this is that people buy from people that they like. People abuse this by showing that they are on the consumers side by doing something at the beginning that looks like it’s in the interest of the consumer only to essentially take advantage of that trust. Use of celebrities and also things we identify with as a means of being more likable are similar to this. Another example is door-to-door sales man asking for references of other friends that they could talk to and when talking to those friends, mention they are coming on the recommendation of another person. This makes it seem like turning down the sale is somehow rejecting the friend. Tupperware parties and other multi-level marketing campaigns are similar in this way.
  5. Authority The idea and concept here is that people trust the decisions of authority more quickly than they do those who are just like them. My favorite example of this was a study where a person in uniform said to someone, “That person over there needs two dimes, go give them to him!”. 92% of people complied when the person was in uniform. When they were dressed in street clothes, only 42% of people complied. Related to this was the psychology of size (those who are bigger appear to be in greater authority). It seems that when authorities or someone we perceive to be authority commands something people are more willing to do it without thinking about what it is they are asking and why. Amazingly, even just a title or clothes were sufficient to give people this sense.
  6. Scarcity For some reason, when we find out that something is limited we value it higher than we should. The basic example of this chapter was a study where cookies were rated by people. The cookies came out of a jar that was either full or near empty. When the jar was near empty, the cookies rated higher than when the jar was full. Related to this was the idea that when parents prohibit their children from seeing a romantic interest, it makes that person seem even better than if there wasn’t pressure (Romeo and Juliet falling into this to the point of death). If we see something that has a limited time or we are going to lose if we don’t act now, we actually value the object higher. My favorite example from this chapter was the authors brother who put himself through college by looking for used cars taht were listed at the low end of their blue book value, and subsequently buying them, washing them, and listing them again for a higher value with an ad that was sure to draw a lot of interest. When people called to setup an appointment to see the car, he would give everyone who called the exact same appointment time. The first would show up and start looking at the car and making remarks about the dings etc. The second would then show up and would be asked, either by the brother or the first buyer, to wait on the side as the first buyer was here first. This significantly increased the pressure on the first buyer to make a full price offer since the second buyer was waiting to look at it. Similarly, the second person, starts valuing the car higher because he may not get a chance to have it. Then you add a third, a forth and you sell the car for a higher price.

Overall I would recommend this book. It has some fascinating examples in it and is similar to Blink which I also recommend. One of the most valuable pieces of information walking away from this was to be aware of the decisions that we make in our day to day lives without thinking about them and to avoid being manipulated by those who are falsly preying on these types of inclinations.

Presenting To Win

Recently, I read “Presenting to Win”. It was excellent. It was so good, that if you ever have to give presentations on a regular basis, you should read this book as soon as possible.

This book is particularly targetted toward selling presentations but applies in a much broader way to any presentation. The result of a presentation that follows these guidelines is likely to be met with an emotional response by the audience. The author’s background is in cinematography and so his instruction is very much about creating a story for the audience to follow. More than that, keeping the audience in mind for the entire presentation.

His four primary questions:

  1. What is your Point B? [What do you want your audience to understand/believe/do by the end of the presentation]
  2. Who is your audience and what is their WIIFY? [What's In It For You (Them) - What do they want from the presentation?]
  3. What are your Roman Columns? [After doing a mind map/brainstorm of the presentation, identify the key points that the audience needs?]
  4. Why have you put the Roman Columns in a particular order? In other words, which Flow Structure have you chosen? [How do you want to tell the story?]

One of the primary points that is made is to keep your audience from thinking. Don’t show slides that force your audience to leave the presentation mentally (stop listening and start reading or trying to figure things out). Slides which are too complicated will force people to have to think through why they are there and will stop listening to your presentation. Anyway, it’s very worth the time to read it.

The Culture Code

Last week, I picked up a book called “The Culture Code: An Ingenious Way to Understand Why People Around the World Live and Buy as They Do” by Clotaire Rapaille. Earlier this year, our investor pointed me to one of the marketing VP’s for one of their companies who had done a workshop on identifying the emotional needs of a customer and fulfilling them. When I talked to the VP, he pointed me to Clotaire Rapaille’s work and I did some research into what he was doing and also read “The 22 Laws of Marketing” which was recommended by this gentleman. Aparently, he worked at Iomega and hired Dr. Rapaille to help them identify how people perceived storage. The result of that work was the Zip drive (which you may have heard of). Anyway, this all set the ground for wanting to read this book. Fortunately, the Fremont Library had a copy so I put it on reserve and read it last week.

More >